[contracycle]

Originally Posted by parihaka

Oh but we do. Unlike you. Go on, post a single paper that prooves using real data that anthropogenic co2 emissions have increased global temperature.
The thing is you can't can you?

Don't be ridiculous. An overwhelming quantity of scientific data has been appearing in journals for years. The fact that you are scientifically illiterate is hardly my problem.

There is no such thing, a simple lie put about by the ourbabyjesusalgore cultists such as yourself

So, now, you clearly did not read the link I provided. Claiming that "there is no consensus" is like claiming the moon ios made of green cheese. I quote:

* How can Lindzen, a member of the National Academies be wrong about the consensus?

Well every major scientific society on the entire planet with relevant expertise disagrees with him. Even the National Academy of Sciences, which he is a member of, disagrees with him. Here is a press release released in 2005 which opens with the words “Climate Change is real”. It’s conclusion begins with “We urge all nations, in the line with the UNFCCC principles, to take prompt action to reduce the causes of climate change, adapt to its impacts and ensure that the issue is included in all relevant national and international strategies.” It is signed by:


Academia Brasiliera de Ciências, Brazil
Royal Society of Canada, Canada
Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Academié des Sciences, France
Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher, Germany
Indian National Science Academy, India
Accademia dei Lincei, Italy
Science Council of Japan, Japan
Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia
Royal Society, United Kingdom
National Academy of Sciences, United States of America

* For a complete analysis of the consensus which Lindzen says doesn’t exist please go here:

http://www.logicalscience.com/consensus/consensus.htm

Your argument is sheer idiocy. What, are all the worlds science academies being run by little green men or something? Pathetic and ridiculous.