[flogger]

Human induced climate change is perhaps the biggest hoax perpetrated on the general public in my lifetime and heres why.


People do not understand that they have no proof of "Global Warming" being caused by man outside of useless computer models?

All the computer illiterates are convinced that because something is done on a "super computer" that costs "millions of dollars" it is infallible. Plugging in biased, incomplete or flat out wrong data combined with poorly understood systems into a "model" that includes god knows how many guesses and assumptions will give you junk. Garbage in = Garbage out. The more complex the model the more "mysterious" it seems. Processing more complex data in more complex ways via guessing gives you more complex junk results. But since the models have been "tuned" (guesstimated or deliberately altered to get the results you want) they get results that "seem" likely, except it is based on a complex serious of junk calculations and data.

The problem is computer models need exact information (accurate data and the correct procedure to process the data) to get exact answers, without that you get junk results, period. The public gives computer climate models this mystical aura because they are largely computer illiterate about how they actually work and when they hear the term "computer" they do not want to sound or feel stupid, so they nod their heads and go along with it.

Nothing is emotional about computers they are pure logical machines, 1 + 1 must = 2. Imagine trying to use random numbers to get a right answer on a calculator but you do not know if you are to add or multiply those numbers and that "right answer" you have no way to confirm because it is 50 years from now. Sound crazy? Welcome to Global Climate Modeling.

What the modelers do is they keep playing with the numbers in a much more complex way until they think they guess right. A useless exercise. These same climate models computers are used to predict your weather and you know how accurate they are. But damn! Al Gore and Gavin Schmidt can certainly tell your what the climate will be 50-100 years from now! Give me a break.

Why are we not turning to models to predict the future for everything? Because they can't, not even remotely. Some of them work "sort of" for the weather in very, very short term results (1-3 days) until all the data they are processing that is wrong combined with all the data they are missing and the millions of variables they are not accounting for start to kick in and grow exponentially the farther out the model runs and wham - the model is wrong. No kidding.

Modeling 50-100 years in the future when they cannot even give you accurate weather 3 days out? Don't be fools, , Computer Models cannot predict the future with anything as complex as the Earth's climate.

"Man-Made" Global Warming is an invented hysteria based on a politically driven agenda that suits many across the political spectrum and as soon as we purge ourselves of this latest 'religion' the healthier mankind will be. I dont fear climate change but I do fear what these 'worthies' will have in store for as should we not robustly challenge thier views, just because its soooo ....unfashionably non PC to do so. The billions that have already been squandered on this non problem should not be further added to in manufacturing another round of computer contrived disinformation as there are no doubt as many climate models as there are modellers and none of them have gotten it right so far . Lets spend it where it CAN actually benefit humanity for a change I say .

Computers are ultimately calculators NOT crystal balls like some in the climate community would have you believe and unless the data used in this calculator and its method of calculation is correct then it is worthless. At present we have no certainty of either factor frankly so ultimately its all just guesswork yet this guesswork is what these gurus would like us to hang mankinds future upon ! The real world climate doesnt seem to want to comply at the moment so as far as I'm concerned without the contrivance of computer modelling the whole AGW premise is junk science at its most dangerous.